[Evaluation of conditioning factors of morbimortality in duodenopacreatectomy in periampullary neoplasms]. / Evaluación de los factores condicionantes de morbi-mortalidad en la duodenopancreatectomía por neoplasias periampulares.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to define the factors that condition complications and mortality in a group of 119 patients with periampullary neoplasms operated on at a general hospital. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Between October 2002 and December 2006, 119 patients who were diagnosed with periampullary neoplasms and underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy at Rebagliati Hospital were evaluated. RESULTS: Age and sex were not conditioning factors of complications. A significant difference in the type of pancreatic anastomosis used was noticed, whereby telescoping was a conditioning factor of complication (p<0.009) compared with mucous-mucous anastomosis.After analyzing the bleeding associated with each complication, a significant connection was established between the greatest bleeding volume obtained in the operating room with the development of pancreatic fistulas (p<0.03), re-operation (p<0.01), abscesses (p<0.006) and intestinal fistulas (p<0.001).The complications related to mortality in patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were evaluated. It was observed that pancreatic fistulas (p<0.003), intestinal fistulas (p<0.003) and gallbladder fistulas (p<0.03), intra-abdominal hemorrhaging and bleeding during a standard operating procedure (SOP), transfusions and re-operations were factors that increased mortality significantly. When the surgeon was evaluated as a factor of morbimortality, it was proven that there was a connection between the surgical volume and the incidence of complications and mortality.There was a shorter hospital stay, a lower incidence of intra-operative bleeding and lower morbimortality in the high surgical volume group. CONCLUSIONS: The most-feared complications, since they are directly related to mortality, are intestinal fistulas, intra-abdominal hemorrhaging, intra-abdominal abscesses, gallbladder fistulas and the need to undergo repeated operations. Both complications and mortality are directly related to the surgeon factor, which, according to our analysis is the most important factor in decreasing costs, morbidity and mortality in this type of surgery.

Evaluación de los factores condicionantes de morbi-mortalidad en la duodenopancreatectomía por neoplasias periampulares / Evaluation of conditioning factors or morbimortality in duodenopancreatectomy in periampullary neoplasms

El propósito de este estudio, es definir cuales son los factores que condicionan las complicaciones y la mortalidad en un grupo de 119 pacientes con neoplasias peri ampulares operados en un hospital general. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Desde Octubre del 2002 hasta Diciembre del 2006 se analizaron 119 pacientes operados de duodenopancreatectomía en el hospital Rebagliati por el diagnostico de neoplasia peri ampular.RESULTADOS: La edad y el sexo no fueron factores condicionantes de complicaciones. Se observo una diferencia significativa en el tipo de anastomosis pancreática utilizadadonde el telescopaje fue un factor condicionante de complicación (p<0.009) Cuando se comparó con a la anastomosis mucosa-mucosa. Al analizar el sangrado con cada una de las complicaciones, se pudo ver que existía una relación significativa entre el mayor volumen de sangrado en sala de operaciones con el desarrollo de fístula pancreática (p<0.03), reoperación (p<0.01), absceso (p<0.006), y fístula intestinal (p<0.001). Se evaluó cuales fueron las complicaciones relacionados a la mortalidad en los pacientes sometidos a Pancreatoduodenectomía (PD), se pudo observar que la fístula pancreática (p<0.003), la fístula intestinal (p<0.003), la fístula biliar (p<0.03), la hemorragia intra abdominal, el sangrado en Sala de Operaciones (SOP), las transfusiones y las reoperaciones fueron factores que aumentaron la mortalidad, en forma significativa. Cuando se evaluó al cirujano como factor de morbi-mortalidad, se pudo comprobar queexistía una relación entre el volumen quirúrgico y la incidencia de complicaciones y mortalidad. Teniendo una menor estancia hospitalaria una menor incidencia en el sangradointra operatorio y una morbi-mortalidad menor en el grupo de alto volumen quirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: Las complicaciones más temidas ya que se relacionan directamente con la mortalidad son: la fístula intestinal, hemorragia intra abdominal, absceso intraabdominal, fístula biliar y la necesidad de...

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to define the factors that condition complications and mortality in a group of 119 patients with periampullary neoplasms operated on at a general hospital. MATERIALS & METHOD: Between October 2002 and December 2006, 119 patients who were diagnosed with periampullary neoplasms and underwent a pancreatoduodenectomyat Rebagliati Hospital were evaluated. RESULTS: Age and sex were not conditioning factors of complications. A significant difference in the type of pancreatic anastomosis used was noticed, whereby telescopingwas a conditioning factor of complication (p<0.009) compared with mucous-mucous anastomosis. After analyzing the bleeding associated with each complication, a significant connection was established between the greatest bleeding volume obtained in the operating room with the development of pancreatic fistulas (p<0.03), re-operation (p<0.01), abscesses (p<0.006) and intestinal fistulas (p<0.001). The complications related to mortality in patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were evaluated. It was observed that pancreatic fistulas (p<0.003), intestinal fistulas (p<0.003) and gallbladder fistulas (p<0.03), intra-abdominal hemorrhaging and bleeding during a standard operating procedure (SOP), transfusions and re-operations were factors that increased mortality significantly. When the surgeon was evaluated as a factor of morbimortality, it was proven that there was a connection between the surgical volume and the incidence of complications andmortality. There was a shorter hospital stay, a lower incidence of intra-operative bleeding and lower morbimortality in the high surgical volume group.CONCLUSIONS: The most-feared complications, since they are directly related to mortality, are intestinal fistulas, intra-abdominal hemorrhaging, intra-abdominal abscesses,gallbladder fistulas and the need to undergo repeated operations. Both complications and mortality are directly related to the...

[Morbidity and mortality rates in relation to the "surgeon factor" after duodenopancreatectomy]. / Morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias de acuerdo al "factor cirujano" tras duodenopancreatectomía.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to determine whether the surgeon factor has an independent effect on morbidity and mortality rates after duodenopancreatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between October 2002 and December 2006, we performed a study of 119 patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy. The surgeons were divided into 3 groups according to the number of interventions they performed each year: a low volume group (three Whipple procedures per year), a medium volume group (four to 10 Whipple procedures per year) and a high volume group (> 10 Whipple procedures per year). RESULTS: The morbidity rate was higher in the low volume group (82%) than in the high volume group (35%). Length of hospital stay was clearly longer in the low and medium volume groups (27 days, and 21 days) than in the high volume group (17 days). Comparison of the results of the 3 groups revealed that the group performing three or less interventions per year (low volume) had the highest mortality rate (47%), while the group performing more than 10 interventions per year (high volume) had a very low mortality rate (4%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the volume-to-surgeon ratio was inversely proportional to morbidity, length of hospital stay, return to oral intake, and mortality rates. Therefore, increasing surgical volume could improve morbidity and mortality rates.

Morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias de acuerdo al “factor cirujano” tras duodenopancreatectomía / Morbidity and mortality rates in relation to the "surgeon factor" after duodenopancreatectomy

Objetivos. El presente estudio está diseñado para determinar si hay un efecto independiente en la morbilidad y la mortalidad operatoria luego de la duodenopancreatectomía tomando en cuenta el factor cirujano. Material y método. Durante el período comprendido entre octubre de 2002 y diciembre de 2006 se realizó un estudio sobre 119 pacientes, a quienes se les realizó una duodenopancreatectomía. Se dividió a los cirujanos según el número de pacientes operados por año en 3 grupos, de bajo volumen (hasta 3 Whipple por año), mediano volumen (más de 3 hasta 10 Whipple por año) y alto volumen (> 10 Whipple por año). Resultados. La morbilidad fue mayor en el grupo de bajo volumen (82%) en comparación con el de alto volumen (35%). La estancia hospitalaria fue marcadamente mayor en los grupos de bajo y mediano volumen (27 días y 21 días) en comparación con el grupo de alto volumen en que fue de 17 días. Cuando se compararon los resultados de los 3 grupos, se evidenció que el grupo que tuvo 3 o menos cirugías por año (bajo volumen) presentó la tasa más alta de mortalidad (47%), mientras que el grupo de más de 10 cirugías por año (alto volumen) presentó una mortalidad muy baja (4%). Conclusiones. Encontramos que la relación volumen/ cirujano era inversamente proporcional a la morbilidad, estancia hospitalaria, reinicio de la vía oral y mortalidad. Por lo que podríamos suponer que el volumen quirúrgico podría mejorar la morbilidad y la mortalidad (AU)

Objectives. The present study was designed to determine whether the surgeon factor has an independent effect on morbidity and mortality rates after duodenopancreatectomy. Material and method. Between October 2002 and December 2006, we performed a study of 119 patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy. The surgeons were divided into 3 groups according to the number of interventions they performed each year: a low volume group (three Whipple procedures per year), a medium volume group (four to 10 Whipple procedures per year) and a high volume group (> 10 Whipple procedures per year). Results. The morbidity rate was higher in the low volume group (82%) than in the high volume group (35%). Length of hospital stay was clearly longer in the low and medium volume groups (27 days, and 21 days) than in the high volume group (17 days). Comparison of the results of the 3 groups revealed that the group performing three or less interventions per year (low volume) had the highest mortality rate (47%), while the group performing more than 10 interventions per year (high volume) had a very low mortality rate (4%). Conclusions. We found that the volume-to-surgeon ratio was inversely proportional to morbidity, length of hospital stay, return to oral intake, and mortality rates. Therefore, increasing surgical volume could improve morbidity and mortality rates (AU)